1. Крючков Б. И., Карпов А. А., Усов В. М. Перспективные подходы к применению сервисных роботов в области пилотируемой космонавтики // Информатика и автоматизация. 2014. Т. 1, № 32. С. 125-151. EDN: RZSWMP
2. Рогаткин Д. А., Лапитан Д. Г., Лапаева Л. Г. Концепция мобильных автономных сервисных роботов для медицины // Биомедицинская радиоэлектроника. 2013. № 5. С. 46-56. EDN: QBKDTZ
3. Чиров Д. С., Новак К. В. Перспективные направления развития робототехнических комплексов специального назначения // Вопросы безопасности. 2018. № 2. С. 50-59. EDN: XRFHFB
4. Технологии модернизации и очувствления мобильных роботов специального назначения / В. Е. Пряничников, В. П. Андреев, К. Б. Кирсанов [и др.] // Известия Южного федерального университета. Технические науки. 2011. Т. 116, № 3. С. 166-171. EDN: NPKGVT
5. Malu S. K. et al. Kinematics, localization and control of differential drive mobile robot. Global Journal of Research In Engineering. 2014; 14 (1): 1-9.
6. Stefek A. et al. Energy comparison of controllers used for a differential drive wheeled mobile robot. IEEE Access. 2020; 8: 170915-170927. EDN: XMBEJC
7. Kassaeiyan P., Alipour K., Tarvirdizadeh B. A full-state trajectory tracking controller for tractor-trailer wheeled mobile robots. Mechanism and Machine Theory. 2020; 150: 103872. EDN: JSDIUA
8. Liu Z. et al. Trajectory planning and robust tracking control for a class of active articulated tractor-trailer vehicle with on-axle structure. European Journal of control. 2020; 54: 87-98. EDN: OLIJPJ
9. Laumond J. P. Controllability of a multibody mobile robot. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 1993; 9 (6): 755-763.
10. Michalek M. M. Trailer-maneuverability in n-trailer structures. IEEE robotics and automation letters. 2020; 5 (4): 5105-5112. EDN: JMOIAY
11. Kuleshov A. S. Further development of the mathematical model of a snakeboard. Regular and Chaotic Dynamics. 2007; 12: 321-334. EDN: LKHDUD
12. Bullo F., Lewis A. D. Kinematic controllability and motion planning for the snakeboard. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation. 2003; 19 (3): 494-498. EDN: GMCZVX
13. Shammas E., De Oliveira M. Motion planning for the snakeboard. The International Journal of Robotics Research. 2012; 31 (7): 872-885.
14. Yona T., Or Y. The wheeled three-link snake model: singularities in nonholonomic constraints and stick-slip hybrid dynamics induced by Coulomb friction. Nonlinear Dynamics. 2019; 95 (3): 2307-2324. EDN: LJTCED
15. Rashevsky P. K. About connecting two points of a completely nonholonomic space by admissible curve. Uch. Zapiski Ped. Inst. Libknechta. 1938; 2: 83-94.
16. Transeth A. A. et al. Snake robot obstacle-aided locomotion: Modeling, simulations, and experiments. IEEE Transactions on Robotics. 2008; 24 (1): 88-104.
17. Tanaka M., Matsuno F. Modeling and control of head raising snake robots by using kinematic redundancy. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems. 2014; 75: 53-69. EDN: RFTENF
18. Karavaev Y. L., Kilin A. A. Nonholonomic dynamics and control of a spherical robot with an internal omniwheel platform: Theory and experiments. Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics. 2016; 295: 158-167. EDN: YVANXX
19. Kilin A. A., Karavaev Y. L. Experimental research of dynamic of spherical robot of combined type.Russian Journal of Nonlinear Dynamics. 2015; 11 (4): 721-734. EDN: VJWKUR
20. Bizyaev I. A., Borisov A. V., Mamaev I. S. Exotic dynamics of nonholonomic roller racer with periodic control. Regular and Chaotic Dynamics. 2018; 23: 983-994. EDN: OWSGZP
21. Bizyaev I. A., Mamaev I. S. Roller Racer with varying gyrostatic momentum: acceleration criterion and strange attractors. Regular and Chaotic Dynamics. 2023; 28 (1): 107-130. EDN: ZHOLVN