1. Петросян Э.А. Аэродинамика соосного вертолета. М., Полигон-пресс, 2004.
2. Соковиков Ю.Г. Применение вертолетов на авианесущих кораблях. М., Военное изд-во, 1989.
3. Taymourtash N., Zagaglia D., Zanotti A., et al. Experimental study of a helicopter model in shipboard operations. Aerosp. Sc. Technol., 2021, vol. 115, no. 2, art. 106774. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2021.106774 EDN: CINSNN
4. Shuka S., Singh S.N., Sinha S.S., et al. A conceptual method to assess ship-helicopter dynamic interface. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G, 2020, vol. 234, no. 5, pp. 1092-1116. DOI: 10.1177/0954410019896741 EDN: LJZDXJ
5. Wall A., Thornhill E., Barber H., et al. Experimental investigations into the effect of at-sea conditions on ship airwake characteristics. J. Wind Eng. Ind. Aerodyn., 2022, vol. 223, art. 104933. DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2022.104933 EDN: GVHERZ
6. Гузеев А.С., Морозова Е.А., Рудниченко А.А. Исследование структуры воздушного потока вблизи надводной части судна. Труды Крыловского государственного научного центра, 2024, т. 2, № 408, с. 53-58. EDN: KJUCWP
7. Zhu N., Zhang Z., Gnanamanickan E., et al. Dynamics of large-scale flow structures within ship airwakes. AIAA Scitech Forum, 2022, art. 2532. DOI: 10.2514/6.2022-2532
8. Вышинский В.В., Корняков А.А., Судаков Г.Г. Исследование вихревого следа за авианесущим кораблем. Научный вестник МГТУ ГА, 2011, № 172, с. 27-33. EDN: OUWNAP
9. Вышинский В.В., Корняков А.А., Свириденко Ю.Н. Моделирование возмущенного поля скоростей в окрестности вертолетоносца типа “Мистраль”. Труды МФТИ, 2014, т. 6, № 2, с. 114-121. EDN: SFRFCH
10. Босняков И.С., Корняков А.А., Судаков Г.Г. Расчет поля скоростей в окрестности корабля при его движении, наличии градиентного ветра и качки. Труды МФТИ, 2015, т. 7, № 1, с. 28-35. EDN: TTMQKD
11. Yuan W., Wall A., Thornhill E., et al. CFD aided ship design and helicopter opertion. J. Mar. Sc. Eng., 2022, vol. 10, no. 9, art. 1304. DOI: 10.3390/jmse10091304
12. Gnanamanickan E., Zhang Z., Seth D., et al. Structure of the ship airwake in a simulated atmospheric boundary layer. AIAA Aviation Forum, 2022, art. 2702. DOI: 10.2514/6.2020-2702
13. Dacheng S., Guohua X., Shuilin H., et al. Numerical investigation of rotor loads of a shipborne coaxial-rotor helicopter during a vertical landing based on moving overset mesh method. Eng. Appl. Comput. Fluid Mech., 2019, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 309-326. DOI: 10.1080/19942060.2019.1585390
14. Roper D.M., Owen I., Padfield G.D. Integrating CFD and piloted simulation to quantify ship-helicopter operating limits. Aeronaut. J., 2006, vol. 110, no. 1109, pp. 419-428. DOI: 10.1017/S0001924000001329
15. Forrest J.S., Hodge S.J., Owen I., et al. An investigation of ship airwake phenomena using time-accurate CFD and piloted helicopter flight simulation. Proc. 34th European Rotorcraft Forum, 2008. URL: https://www.academia.edu/18060163/An_investigation_of_ship_airwake_phenomena_using_time_accurate_CFD_and_piloted_helicopter_flight_simulation (дата обращения: 15.12.2025).
16. Wang Y., White M., Owen I., et al. Effects of visual and motion cues in flight simulation of ship-borne helicopter operations. CEAS Aeronaut. J., 2013, vol. 4, no. 4, pp. 385-396. DOI: 10.1007/s13272-013-0085-9 EDN: TOPKIQ
17. Moon J., Domercant J.C., Marvis D.N. A simplified approach to assessment of mission success for helicopter landing on a ship. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst., 2015, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 680-688. DOI: 10.1007/s12555-013-0092-y EDN: MFSGCM
18. Forrest J., Kaaria C., Owen I. Evaluating ship superstructure aerodynamics for maritime helicopter operations through CFD and flight simulation. Aeronaut. J., 2016, vol. 120, no. 1232, pp. 1578-1603. DOI: 10.1017/aer.2016.76
19. Scott P., Kelly M., White M.D., et al. Using piloted simulation to measure pilot workload of landing a helicopter on a small ship. European Rotorcraft Forum, 2017. URL: https://livrepository.liverpool.ac.uk/3009013 (дата обращения: 15.12.2025).
20. Forrest J.S., Oven L., Padfield G., et al. Ship-helicopter operating limits prediction using piloted flight simulation and time-accurate airwakes. J. Aircr., 2012, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 1020-1031. DOI: 10.2514/1.C031525
21. Kelly M.F., White M.D., Owen I., et al. Piloted flight simulation for helicopter operation to the Queen Elizabeth class aircraft carriers. 43 European Rotorcraft Forum and 28 Society of Flight Test Engineers European Chapter Symposium, 2017. DOI: 10.2514/1.C035733 EDN: VHUXDK
22. Watson N., Owen I., White M.D. Evaluating the effect of frigate hangar shape modifications on helicopter recovery using piloted flight simulation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. G, 2024, vol. 239, no. 1, pp. 27-45. DOI: 10.1177/09544100241282718 EDN: NOTGRU